By: rich the engineer
What's TinyFlaccid's next bright idea? Ummm... we'll get back to you on that, real soon now.
View ArticleBy: Mike Magee
Hi James, it didn't take much space, nor many pixels. Sorry to waste your time. You obviously have enough time to comment. We just love readers...
View ArticleBy: 98 Guy
Micro$oft became irrelevant when it forced the incredibly vulnerable XP onto every PC back in early 2002, thereby helping to create the malware (virus, trojan, rootkit, botnet, and spam) industry as we...
View ArticleBy: RichardP
You wouldn't have thought so but from the first reader comment it seems there are Microsoft fanbois around. In fact, the article summarised things pretty well. Large companies with a...
View ArticleBy: Kiran Chowdary
Mike Magee, If I use strong words its obvious that my comment gets cleaned up. So I won't. So I explain you now - People with incomplete knowledge can speak "rubbish" and people with incomplete...
View ArticleBy: John
I'd love to agree with your title but despite reasonably accurately tracing history, you have missed the fact that Microsoft eventually, copy very very well. They are not innovators and they always...
View ArticleBy: fred
What you are overlooking is the fact that 90% of work PCs still run Windows. That's not going to change very soon because they make the best software development tools for businesses. With the advent...
View ArticleBy: abhi
Ill informed (article) and vindictive (writer). This is Tech-Journo gold. "Hi James, it didn't take much space, nor many pixels. Sorry to waste your time. You obviously have enough time to comment. We...
View ArticleBy: MPS
Just to add a couple of other points. MS-DOS/PC-DOS wasn't a Microsoft product, it was bought from a company called Seattle Computer Products. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_Computer_Products IE...
View Article
